Cassidy vs. Zapier

AI-Embedded Automation vs. API-Driven Workflows

Automation has evolved beyond simple “if this, then that” workflows. Cassidy is an AI-native automation platform built for teams that need automation with human-like judgment, not just predefined app connectors. By embedding AI at every level, Cassidy can understand context, make decisions, and even interact with users as an assistant.

Make.com, on the other hand, is a traditional visual workflow builder that treats AI as an external add-on. Users can connect AI services via API modules, but AI isn’t an intrinsic part of every workflow. While Make.com excels at connecting apps in complex scenarios, it lacks built-in AI capabilities like memory or autonomous decision-making.

For enterprise decision-makers, this difference is critical. Below, we compare Cassidy and Make.com across key areas.

‍

‍

Embedded Intelligence vs. "Add-On" AI

Cassidy has AI built into every workflow, making it seamless to analyze data, generate content, and take intelligent actions. Workflows can process unstructured information, reference a knowledge base, and make decisions without needing manual API calls. AI is deeply embedded, meaning users don’t have to configure prompts or external services for each step.

Make.com treats AI as an optional add-on. To use AI, you must manually insert an API call (e.g., OpenAI) into a workflow, manage API keys, and configure prompts. There’s no native memory or knowledge retention, so workflows don’t improve over time. AI in Make is an external tool, not a core part of automation.

AI Assistants – Interactive AI vs. Static Workflows

Cassidy offers real-time AI assistants that integrate into Slack, Teams, and Chrome. These assistants can answer questions, generate responses, and automate tasks based on context. A sales assistant can draft personalized outreach, while an IT assistant can troubleshoot employee requests—all within chat.

Make.com does not have AI assistants. It is focused on background workflows and lacks an interface for employees to interact with AI in real-time. While you could trigger workflows from Slack, Make provides no built-in AI agent that understands context or remembers past interactions.

Enterprise Scalability – Built for Large Organizations

Cassidy is enterprise-ready with SOC 2 Type II compliance, SSO, granular permissions, and access controls. AI can be restricted by role, ensuring security across departments. Its infrastructure is designed for scalability and compliance at an enterprise level. Visit our trust center here.

Make.com, while growing in enterprise features, lacks SOC 2 Type II certification and has simpler role-based permissions. It is well-suited for team-based automation but requires additional governance setup for large-scale deployments.

AI-Driven Flexibility vs. Predefined Workflows

Cassidy lets teams build AI-powered workflows that adapt dynamically. AI can process data, make decisions, and adjust workflows on the fly. Enterprises can use different AI models (GPT-4, Claude) and fine-tune outputs, creating intelligent automations that improve over time.

Make.com is a powerful visual workflow builder but lacks AI adaptability. Workflows require predefined logic, meaning users must manually configure every step. AI cannot influence decisions without external scripting, making automation more rigid.

Use Cases – Where Cassidy Delivers More Value

Cassidy enables AI-powered automation that goes beyond simple workflows, making it ideal for:

• RFP Automation: AI reads documents, finds relevant answers, and drafts responses using past knowledge.
• Sales & Marketing Copilots: Assistants research prospects, summarize insights, and generate personalized outreach.
• Customer Support AI: AI triages support tickets, drafts responses, and escalates urgent issues in real time.
• HR & Compliance Automation: AI reviews policies, answers employee questions, and ensures regulatory compliance.

Make.com is best for structured app integrations, such as syncing CRM records, sending notifications, or processing simple data flows. AI is an enhancement, not a core function.

Choosing the Right Automation Platform for Your Enterprise

Cassidy is designed for enterprises that need AI-powered workflows and assistants that evolve with their business. Its AI is deeply embedded, making automation more intelligent, adaptable, and scalable.

Make.com is an excellent tool for building structured workflows, but its AI capabilities are limited to external API calls. For enterprises looking to automate complex, AI-driven processes, Cassidy is the more future-proof investment.

Ready to experience Cassidy firsthand? Book a demo today to see how an AI-first automation platform can unify knowledge, streamline processes, and transform the way your teams work.

Cassidy and Microsoft 365 Copilot both bring AI assistance to the workplace, but they differ significantly in scope and approach. Cassidy is an AI-native automation platform designed to integrate AI into diverse workflows across an entire business, while Microsoft 365 Copilot functions as an assistant within Microsoft’s suite of apps (Word, Excel, Outlook, Teams).

While Copilot is useful for enhancing productivity within Microsoft tools, Cassidy goes further by enabling cross-platform workflows, providing AI model flexibility, and offering enterprise-level support. Below is a comparison of how Cassidy and Microsoft Copilot stack up across key areas:

‍

‍

AI Flexibility: Multiple Models vs. Single Model

Cassidy offers extensive AI flexibility. It supports multiple AI models, including OpenAI’s GPT-4, Google’s Gemini, and Anthropic’s Claude. This allows organizations to choose the best AI for different tasks and future-proof their automation as better models emerge.

Microsoft Copilot, on the other hand, is locked into Microsoft’s chosen OpenAI model. Users have no control over the AI provider and must rely solely on the models Microsoft decides to deploy. This lack of flexibility can limit performance in specific use cases where another model might be a better fit.

Workflows & Automation: Multi-Step vs. In-App Only

Cassidy enables true end-to-end AI-powered workflows across multiple tools and steps. Its no-code workflow builder lets users create AI-driven automations that take action across apps, process data, and even trigger real-time alerts. For example, Cassidy can read an incoming email, analyze its content, update a CRM, and notify the right person in Slack—all in one seamless process.

Microsoft Copilot, however, is limited to acting within individual Microsoft 365 apps. It assists with tasks like writing emails in Outlook or summarizing documents in Word but does not offer full automation across tools. Microsoft’s Copilot Studio allows for some custom Copilot assistants, but these are largely confined to Microsoft’s ecosystem and require developer setup.

Integration Scope: Diverse Tools vs. Microsoft-Only

Cassidy connects with over 100+ third-party applications, including CRMs, ticketing systems, knowledge bases, and communication platforms like Slack and Teams. It integrates deeply with both Microsoft and non-Microsoft tools, ensuring seamless automation across an organization’s full tech stack.

Microsoft Copilot, by contrast, is designed primarily for Microsoft 365 users. It works well within the Microsoft suite but has limited or no native integration with third-party tools like Slack, Google Drive, or external CRMs. This lack of connectivity makes it difficult to implement AI-driven workflows outside of Microsoft’s ecosystem.

Enterprise Scalability: Organization-Wide vs. Individual Use

Cassidy is built for enterprise-wide deployment, allowing teams to create AI assistants and workflows that span across departments. Its centralized Knowledge Base ensures that AI-powered automations pull from company-wide data, maintaining accuracy and consistency. Admins can manage access, enforce security policies, and customize AI responses for different teams.

Microsoft Copilot is primarily a personal assistant within Microsoft apps, meaning it functions on a per-user basis rather than being centrally managed for an organization. Any attempt to extend its capabilities across teams would require significant developer effort and remain constrained within the Microsoft environment.

Onboarding & Implementation: Hands-On vs. Self-Service

Successfully implementing AI tools in an enterprise requires more than just software—it requires expert guidance, training, and ongoing support to ensure adoption and success. Cassidy provides a white-glove onboarding experience, working directly with each organization to build, customize, and integrate AI solutions effectively.

When you adopt Cassidy, you get:

• A Dedicated Account Manager – Your team is assigned a Cassidy AI expert who helps design AI assistants and workflows tailored to your business needs. This ensures your AI solutions align with your processes and deliver real impact from day one.
• Team Training Sessions – Cassidy provides hands-on training to help teams in sales, marketing, support, and operations seamlessly integrate AI into their workflows. This ensures that AI adoption happens smoothly across departments, not just in isolated pockets.
• Weekly Office Hours – Cassidy hosts live Q&A sessions where customers can get expert advice, troubleshoot challenges, and explore new use cases for AI within their business.
• Private Slack Support – A direct line of communication with Cassidy’s team, allowing customers to ask questions, request features, and receive real-time assistance whenever they need it.

This high-touch support model ensures that organizations don’t just buy AI tools—they successfully implement them and maximize their value.

By contrast, Microsoft Copilot follows a self-service onboarding approach. While Microsoft provides documentation, FAQs, and standard admin guides, there is no dedicated onboarding or personalized implementation support. If an organization needs additional guidance, they may have to work with third-party Microsoft partners at an extra cost. This means that adoption relies heavily on internal IT teams to configure Copilot and train users, which can slow down AI implementation—especially for enterprises looking to scale AI across departments.

Final Thoughts: Why Cassidy Stands Out

Microsoft 365 Copilot is a useful personal productivity tool within the Microsoft suite, helping with writing, summarizing, and task management inside apps like Word and Outlook. However, it lacks true AI-powered workflow automation and is restricted to Microsoft’s ecosystem.

Cassidy, on the other hand, enables end-to-end AI automation across your entire tech stack. It integrates with multiple tools, supports multiple AI models, and allows enterprises to build custom workflows that adapt to their specific needs. With hands-on onboarding, admin controls, and broad AI flexibility, Cassidy is the better choice for businesses looking to deploy AI across departments and tools.

Ready to see how Cassidy can automate your workflows? Book a demo today.

AI Automation vs. Enterprise Search

Cassidy and Glean serve different purposes in the enterprise AI space. Cassidy is an AI automation platform that executes multi-step workflows, while Glean is primarily an enterprise search tool designed to help teams find and retrieve information.

The biggest difference? Cassidy doesn’t just find information—it takes action. Whether automating RFP responses, triaging support tickets, or generating approvals, Cassidy applies AI to automate real work, while Glean focuses on retrieving knowledge across enterprise systems.

Here’s a quick feature comparison:

‍

‍

Cassidy: AI That Works For You

Cassidy isn’t just about surfacing information—it’s about automating work. It can:

• Draft & process RFPs in seconds, pulling from company knowledge.
• Triage and route support tickets automatically, reducing workload.
• Enrich and update CRM records, helping sales teams move faster.
• Generate personalized emails, reports, and summaries with real business context.

With no-code workflow automation, teams can deploy Cassidy quickly for immediate value—no IT-heavy setup required.

Glean: Search, Not Automation

Glean specializes in enterprise knowledge retrieval, making it easy for employees to find information across wikis, emails, and files. It’s designed to:

• Reduce internal support tickets by giving employees self-service answers.
• Help new hires get up to speed by centralizing company knowledge.
• Improve decision-making by surfacing relevant reports and past work.

Glean’s AI-powered search is fast and accurate, but it doesn’t automate tasks or workflows—users still have to take action manually.

Speed of Deployment: Quick Wins vs. Heavy Rollout

• Cassidy: Deploy in days, not weeks, by targeting a single high-impact use case (e.g., automating customer support responses or drafting proposals). AI assistants and workflows can be embedded directly into Slack, Teams, and email without deep integrations.
• Glean: Requires indexing the entire organization’s data before it’s useful. Companies must integrate Glean with all tools and set up permissions before employees can start using it.

Cassidy delivers value immediately, while Glean is a long-term IT investment.

Automation Workflows vs. AI Agents

• Cassidy: Users build clear, step-by-step workflows—for example, analyzing an incoming request, updating a system, and drafting a response—all automatically. It’s predictable, structured automation that businesses can rely on.
• Glean: Introduces AI “Agents”, which attempt to dynamically generate workflows on the fly based on broad user goals. While promising, this approach lacks fine control and predictability, making it less suited for critical business processes.

Enterprise Readiness & Security

Both platforms meet enterprise security standards, including SOC 2 compliance and strong access controls.

• Cassidy provides role-based access and data privacy controls, ensuring AI assistants only access relevant information.
• Glean enforces strict user permissions, making sure employees only see data they are authorized to access.

While both platforms prioritize security, Cassidy is faster to implement without requiring full company-wide data integration.

Who Should Use Cassidy vs. Glean?

Use Cassidy if you need:

✔️ AI-powered workflow automation that acts, not just retrieves data
✔️ Fast, no-code deployment for targeted automation use cases
✔️ Real-time AI Assistants in Slack, Teams, and Chrome
✔️ Automations that replace manual tasks like RFPs, support triaging, and CRM updates

Use Glean if you need:

✔️ Enterprise-wide search to help employees find existing knowledge
✔️ A centralized knowledge hub that connects to all your company’s data sources
✔️ AI that retrieves information but doesn’t take action

Final Thoughts: Why Cassidy Wins

Glean is a powerful knowledge retrieval tool, but Cassidy goes further—using AI to actually get work done. If your goal is to automate business processes, reduce manual effort, and deploy AI-powered workflows quickly, Cassidy is the clear choice.

Ready to see Cassidy in action? Book a demo today.

‍